Apps shipped.Quality you can see.

If it's a web or mobile app with accounts, data and real users, yes — that's what we build, products that have to run, not demos. A brochure site or a throwaway script, probably not, and we'll tell you straight. Not sure yet? We start with a short, paid scoping that turns the idea into a scope, an architecture and an estimate — and it's yours to keep, whether or not we build the rest together.

There's no price on this page on purpose — a number without your scope would be a guess. What moves it is clear: what the app does, the services it plugs into, how complex the data is, and how tight the timeline is. We scope it together first, then you get a fixed price in writing before any build starts. If it doesn't suit you, you keep the scoping and walk away.

With your app. The code, the repository, the infrastructure and the accounts are yours, handed over in your name at delivery. Nothing depends on Aeria to keep running — no proprietary layer, no licence to renew — and another developer can pick it up the next day.

A stolen password isn't enough on its own. Identity runs on two-factor authentication on every account, wired in from the start rather than bolted on at the end — the first lock, the innermost one, because if identity is wrong nothing outside it holds. It's the standard we ship, not a claim about one particular build.

The database itself says no. With row-level security, each account reads and writes only its own rows — enforced where the data lives, not only in application code someone can forget to call. It's the second lock: it limits the damage even when something above it slips.

Nothing reaches production without a green pipeline: types, lint, tests and a build all have to pass first, and if one is red the change doesn't ship. It doesn't make bugs impossible — it stops the obvious ones at the door, and when something does slip through, the fix comes with a test so it can't return quietly. That's the third lock.

We harden the frame around the app: HTTP security headers set deliberately — content policy, transport security, protection against framing and content-sniffing — with an A on a public scanner as the bar we hold them to. It's the last lock, the outer frame, and it's the one you can check yourself in a minute: don't take our word, check.

No promise before we've read your scope — a timeline invented in advance is a marketing line. We set it at scoping, against what has to be built, the integrations involved and how fast you answer our questions. You get it in writing with the price, and each stage ships something you can open and try.

Fair question, and we won't dress it up: we're young, and there's no wall of famous logos. What you get instead is one person accountable by name, senior hands on the code rather than a hand-off down a chain, the four locks above as a standard you can check, and everything in your own accounts so you can leave. Look at what we've shipped and judge on that.

No. At delivery you get a handover: code, documentation, access, and how to run it. After that you choose — keep us on an optional retainer for fixes and new features, take it in-house, or hand it to someone else. The retainer is a choice, not a lock-in, and you can stop it.

It depends which form. The one on the Rescue page prepares an email in your own mail client: filling it in sends nothing. The « Describe my project » form does send your answers to our server, which writes the brief and emails it to us — or hands it back for you to send yourself. Nothing else: no analytics, no tracking. If you'd rather sign an NDA before sharing details, send yours or ask for ours.

Yes — it's a job of its own, with its own page. We read what exists, then tell you plainly what to keep, fix or rebuild, and why, before bringing it up to the same standard as the rest. Taking over a vibe-coded app